Traditional solar PV
Direct site footprint: approximately 700–890 acres.
Farm productivity on occupied land: typically minimal if ordinary farming stops.
A land-equivalent comparison for a 100 MW project on farmland shows how traditional solar, agrivoltaic design, fossil generation footprints, and crop-enhancing Solargation® change agricultural productivity.
Net agricultural land-equivalent loss = gross project acres × (1 − retained farm productivity).
Negative values mean the field produces a net farm-output gain compared with baseline agricultural productivity.
The table-style cards below convert each technology into an agricultural land-equivalent impact, using the assumptions in the right-hand panel.
Direct site footprint: approximately 700–890 acres.
Farm productivity on occupied land: typically minimal if ordinary farming stops.
Direct site footprint: approximately 700 acres.
Farm productivity retained: approximately 70%–100% in the illustrative case.
Direct site footprint: approximately 12 acres.
Farm productivity on occupied land: 0%, with additional dispersed upstream oil, refining, and transport land impacts.
Direct site footprint: approximately 11 acres.
Farm productivity on occupied land: 0%, with upstream wells, gathering, pipelines, and compressor-station land impacts.
Direct site footprint: approximately 700 acres at 7 acres per MW.
Farm productivity enhanced: approximately 110%–150% of baseline in the illustrative case.
Fossil technologies can appear land-light at the power-plant site, but they also rely on upstream land for fuel extraction, processing, and transport. Agrivoltaic and Solargation® productivity values are illustrative and depend on crop type, design, climate, and farm operations.
The land-use advantage is not only putting panels above crops. It is using the same infrastructure to preserve or improve output through shade, irrigation, microclimate, and data-enabled material dispersal.
Solargation® is intended to preserve and improve farm output through dual use, microclimate support, water efficiency, irrigation integration, and data-driven material dispersal.
Sources noted in the provided land-use graphic: NREL utility-scale PV land use; Jacobson / Stanford land-footprint compilation for fossil power plants; recent agrivoltaic review reporting land-use efficiency gains up to 200%; University of Arizona / Barron-Gafford agrivoltaic field results showing higher yields for some crops and lower transpiration.

Use this clean Solargation® land-use comparison graphic in investor materials, partner conversations, or website downloads.
This land-use page is structured as a responsive HTML5 website that preserves the prior Solargation® visual system while explaining the agricultural land-equivalent comparison in a clearer, web-ready format.
Back to top